The proceedings were one of the first trials widely televised, and brought Nazi atrocities to a worldwide audience. © Copyright 2013 International Crimes Database project - All Rights Reserved, Feedback, cooperation and use of materials, The Eichmann Trial or the Incorrigible Victors. The Court’s jurisdiction is founded upon it by the Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law 5710-1950. Eichmann’s conviction in August 1961 was upheld by the Supreme Court of Israel and on May 31, 1962, he was sent to the gallows. Eichman (defendant) burned a U.S. flag on the steps of the U.S. Capitol as part of a protest of aspects of the government's domestic and foreign policy. Having examined the command structure in place at the SS and the scope of the Accused’s authority, the Court concluded that the latter acted in accordance with general directives from his superiors but he retained wide powers of discretion (para. ” (Luke 18:7-8 New American Bible). When the SD merged with the State Secret Police (Gestapo) to form the Head Office for Reich Security (RSHA), the Accused occupied the role of Special Officer of Zionist Affairs (para. holocaustresearchproject. 91), and oversaw the handling of the transport of Jews (para. Furthermore, the Genocide Convention was invoked, refusing to recognize “universal jurisdiction” and that the accused should be tried in the state where he was said to have commited the criminal acts; in this case, it was Germany (Silving, 1961, p. 312; Arendt, 1963, p. 262; Lisciotto, 2007). Adolf Eichmann was responsible for the implementation of Adolf Hitler’s Final Solution, involving the deportation, robbery and murder of approximately six million Jews, as well as of other minority groups, including Roma and homosexuals. Despite Israel’s efforts to justify their actions, the UN Security Council censured Israel. Filings for this case in the Judicial Records and Archives Database. This act elicited a backlash where Argentinian sovereignty was violated and the United Nations (UN) censured Israel. However, the Israelis felt … Cf. can send it to you via email. In this capacity, he oversaw the transport and deportation of Jewish persons, set up and personally ran an operations centre in Hungary in order to implement the Final Solution there, organised the transfer of money from evacuated Jews to the State and was responsible for the administration of the camps at Terezin and Bergen-Belsen. Two years later, he was appointed into the Sicherheitsdienst (SD), the security service branch under the SS, hunting down dissidents, spies and Jews which was akin to the Gestapo, the dreaded secret police of Nazi Germany known for their brutal methods. Eichmann challenged the Israeli court’s jurisdiction, arguing that the court was not empowered to adjudicate the case against Eichmann … Second, the specific character of the crimes, which was the extermination of the Jewish people, provides the necessary linking point between the Accused and the newly-founded State of Israel, a State established and recognised as the State of the Jews (para. Lisciotto, C. (2007). United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as violating of free speech under the First Amendment. Retrieved 15 May 2010 http://www. Case Summary. In 1989, Congress passed the Flag Protection Act which made it a crime to destroy an American flag or any likeness of an American flag which may be "commonly displayed." Eichmann challenged the Israeli court's jurisdiction, arguing that the court was not empowered to adjudicate the case against Eichmann because his illegal kidnapping by Israeli agents violated international law. These incidents showed that Israel, though the world may not agree with its practice, is committed to justice and will not let any law prevent it from ensuring that real justice will be served, one way or the other but making sure that the punishment fits the crime. x Case Study: The Cyprus Conflict x Linguistic Frontiers x The Refugee Crisis x Otherness Within Teaching Methodology Each of the class meetings will be comprised of a lecture and discussion of the week¶s topic, readings and films. From the outbreak of the War to mid-1941, the Accused devised and carried out the mass deportation of Jewish persons from his role as the Special Referent for Emigration and Evacuation within the RSHA (paras. He rose through the ranks and eventually occupied the position of Head of Section (Referant) for Jewish Affairs charged with all matters related to the implementation of the Final Solution to the Jewish Question. Does the District Court of Jerusalem have jurisdiction to try the case in light of the fact that Eichmann is a foreign national and crimes were committed on foreign territory? In this capacity, he oversaw the transport and deportation of Jewish persons, … 2 September 1998 - Judgement . The Accused, Adolf Eichmann, was an Austrian by birth who volunteered to work for the Security Service (SD) in Berlin. Eichmann was sentenced to death by hanging. ” The American Journal of International Law 55 (2). The allegations concerned the murder of Spanish citizens in Chile, which offences were within the jurisdiction of Spain. When the war ended, Eichmann escaped to Argentina, where years later, he was kidnapped by Israeli officers and forcibly brought to Israel for trial for war-crime charges. Eichman and others were prosecuted under the federal Flag Protection Act for setting fire to American flags. It was argued together with the case United States v.Haggerty.It built on the opinion handed down in the Court's decision the prior year in Texas v. 47 Bergen St--Floor 3, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA, Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this 65). 180). The Eichmann case reminded the world of its duty to act. 34). In early 1942, the Accused was appointed the Referant of the RSHA in matters connected to the Final Solution (para. Adolf Eichmann (defendant) was a German Nazi officer involved in the internment and extermination of Jewish people during World War II. The United States (plaintiff) prosecuted Eichman for violating the Act. After the conference, he was designated Transportation Administrator where ahe served as the chief facilitator of Jews to the death camps following Heydrich’s assassination (Arendt, 1963, p. 112; Sachs, 2001, p. 58-59). See also the brief discussion in Prosecutor v. ... ‘ The Eichmann Case in International Law ’, (1962) Criminal Law Review 671, at 681–67. 93), not only in the Reich but also in other countries (para. The Court's Decision. 88). Furthermore, it also showed that laws, national and international are not perfect as they contain loopholes that would enable those guilty to escape punishment and this was what Eichmann and other former Nazis thought, not to mention that the pursuit of justice has no time limit. However, while requiring Israel to apologize, the reparation demand did not specifically state that Israel give Eichmann back nor require it to punish the individual operatives who “abducted” Eichmann (Silving, 1961, p. 312-314). Group Presentations and assignments will allow students to combine their creative and critical skills. He was transferred to Vienna in 1938 to administer the Central Office for the Emigration of Austrian Jews (para. Adolf Eichmann was a thin little man with bow legs and a hook nose. The prosecution, as well as the Israeli government countered that although they did admit they violated Argentine law, this did not entirely constitute a violation of Argentina’s sovereignty and the Israeli government even regretted it but due to its implicit nature, Argentina regarded it an apology and therefore an admission of guilt to which the Israelis rebutted that the Eichmann’s capture did not present a clear and present danger to the national security of Argentina in any way. 166 Arendt, supra note 2, at 247. These "Transport Jews" were taken to concentration camps and those who were unfit for hard labour were exterminated immediately (para. It was here that the “Final Solution” to the Jewish Question was finalized in terms of logistics as Heydrich bared plans to exterminate the Jews. PODCAST. 12). In autumn 1942, a cover up effort was begun as bodies in mass graves were burned in an effort to hide the slaughter (para. His moral remains were cremated and ashes scattered over the Mediterranean as there was no place in Israel, or any country in the world, to bury him. For legal discussion, see Green, The Eichmann Case, 23 MODERN L. REV. Adolf Eichmann was in charge of the identification, assembly, and transportation of Jews in all parts of Europe that were occupied by Nazi Germany to extermination camps in German-occupied Poland, including Auschwitz, a task that he carried out with zeal and resourcefulness. During Eichmann’s trial, the defense brought up this issue in addition to several others; among them were the legality of the trial itself, the invalidity of Israel’s laws calling for the punishment of Nazis involved in the Holocaust, and that Israel did not exist yet as a state when Eichmann was said to have committed the crimes he was charged with. However, they made it clear that although Israel was censured, this did not mean that they condoned the actions of the Nazis against the Jews in order to defuse potential backlash from the global Jewish community for their apparent insensitivity. In 1960, former Nazi official Adolf Eichmann was arrested by Israeli intelligence operatives in Argentina in a covert operation as part of the Jewish state’s commitment to bring to justice all those who were responsible for the Holocaust that claimed the lives of roughly 6 million Jews in the death camps run by the Nazis as part of their “Final Solution” to eradicate the Jews from the face of the earth because they were regarded by The Nazis as the source of all evil. In May 1960, the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, abducted Eichmann from his hiding place in Argentina and transferred him to Jerusalem to face an Israeli court. The Israeli position also asserted the exceptionality and uniqueness of Eichmann’s case and that this should be something worth considering given the fact the whole world by that time was aware of the atrocities committed by the Nazis. 1 June 2001 - Judgment . Eichmann’s Profile: Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962) became a member of the Nazi party in 1932 and the party saw greater things come to him as he joined the Schutzstaffel (SS), Adolf’s Hitler’s elite bodyguards. Eichmann was apprehended by Israeli agents without the consent or knowledge of the Argentinian government. HAVEN’T FOUND ESSAY YOU WANT? Such a violation of international law constitutes an international tort, which may be “cured” by waiver. 35). In particular, he headed the Eichmann Special Operations Unit in Hungary and did his utmost to carry out the Final Solution (para. website. Eichmann is discussed: law of war: War crimes: …taken in the case of Attorney General of the Government of Israel v. Eichmann, which was decided by the District Court of Jerusalem in 1961. In addition, they asserted that Eichmann left voluntarily and was accompanied by private Israeli citizens who were merely doing their “civic duty” in bringing Nazis to justice. html. Given these circumstances, Eichmann’s arrest was illegal and this could have made his trial null and void. The trial commenced on 11 April 1961 with the indictment charging Eichmann with 15 counts of crimes against the Jewish people, crimes against humanity, war crimes and membership in an organisation declared criminal by the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg 15 years earlier. It is an established rule of law that a person standing trial for an offence against the laws of a State may not oppose his being tried by reason of the illegality of his arrest or the means by which he was brought to the jurisdiction of the court (para. Several prosecutions resulted from the Act. 145). It may well be that Israel has many moral grounds for seeking justice against this ‘‘ enemy of the Jewish people.” This paper will If you need this or any other sample, we The crimes committed by the Accused concern the vital interests of the State, thus it has a right to punish the Accused pursuant to the protective principle (para. The censure or reparation was perhaps a “concession” to help Argentina “save face” because of its policy of not extraditing former Nazis and as a way assuaging their “wounded” national pride or sovereignty because of Israel’s actions. However, org/trials/eichmanntrial. This law does not violate the principles of international law (para. The Supreme Court dismissed his appeal on 29 May 1962. The rationale behind this is that “all offenses committed in the last war (World War II) had fallen under the statue of limitation fifteen years after the end of the war (Arendt 1963, p. 264). But for Israel, part of their mission was to redress the injustice brought upon them and they have been fully committed to bringing to justice those involved, no matter where they are hiding and no matter how long it would take them to do it. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. “Will not God then do justice to his chosen who call out to him day and night? 152) and the camp at Bergen-Belsen (para. He was captured by Israeli Security Forces in Argentina and handed over to the District Court of Jerusalem to stand trial for war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against the Jewish people. Adolf Eichmann (defendant) was a German Nazi officer involved in the internment and extermination of Jewish people during World War II. 326 (196I); Silving, In Re Eichmann: A Dilemma of Law and Morality, 55 AM. The Accused, Adolf Eichmann, was an Austrian by birth who volunteered to work for the Security Service (SD) in Berlin. This is a case proposing from Attorney general of Israel to Adolf Eichmann. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568, 572, 62 S.Ct. If there was one other thing going in Israel’s case, they chose to try him, rather than kill him in Argentina, something that was very easy to do, but which would have created far greater repercussions. In the affirmative, is jurisdiction negated by the abduction of the Accused from a foreign country? Attorney General V. Adolf Eichmann-Case Brief. Is obeying superior orders a defence excluding criminal responsibility? He was unsuccessful in contesting the jurisdiction of the Court or defending his actions by relying on superior orders. Following the end of the Second World War, several leading Nazi leaders were tried, convicted and sentenced at Nuremberg; but there have been several of them that managed to escape and had gone into hiding either seeking asylum or living in complete anonymity in various parts of the world. Prior to the outbreak of World War II, the Accused was a member of the Austrian SS and later volunteered for a position with the Head Office of the Security Service (SD) in Berlin (para. Eichmann was a German Nazi and a SS-Obersturmbannführer equivalent to Lieutenant Colonel. 90), organised the transfer of money from evacuated Jews for the disposal of the SS (para. However, the Israelis felt justified with their deed not only because they have an existing law for it, but they did it because they believed they have “moral superiority” to carry out the deed (Silving, 1961, p. 311). 71-75) and explored the possibility of setting up a slave Jewish state in Madagascar (para. In a way, Israel feels justified in carrying out such actions since they see no one else would help redress their grievances, thereby taking it upon themselves to do it. Argentina, along with several other South American countries, has been the ideal haven for former Nazis, not only because of a large concentration of German immigrants, because they do not extradite foreign criminals, even if they become naturalized citizens. Sentence of life imprisonment affirmed on appeal on 1 June 2001. Adolf Eichmann, head of the Jewish office of the Gestapo during World War II, was convicted of war crimes, crimes against the Jewish people, and… It can be further inferred here that there were political undertones behind these circumstances. Her ICD Brief relates to recent decisions in the Netherlands and Denmark awarding compensation for damage at the hands of the military during armed conflict, including the July 2019 ruling of the Dutch Supreme Court in the 'Mothers of Srebrenica' case. Eichman and the others stated that the Act violated the First Amendment, and courts in Washington State and in the District of Columbia agreed. He was convicted of all 15 counts and sentenced to death. Israel proceeded with the trial and eventually found Eichmann guilty in all chargest against him desptie the fact he invoked the “Nuremberg Defense” where he insisted to the very end he only followed orders of his superiors, namely Hitler. Academic Content. However, they made sure that they possess moral ascendancy, rather than the desire for revenge in carrying out these acts. 153). 165 T. Taylor, ‘Large Questions in the Eichmann Case’, New York Times Magazine, 22 January 1961. Bibliography Bibliography Arendt Hannah. 148). But looking at it from a different persepctive, what may be legal does not absolutely mean it is morally right. Details Eichmann’s role in the “Final Solution” to the Jewish question, beginning with his work in the central office of the SD to his direct role in the deportation and extermination of Hungarian Jews. See also Rousseau, Crontique des Faits Internationaux, 64 REVUE GgNtRALE DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC 771, 772-786 (i96i). 262-263). But testimonies from other former Nazis who worked closely with Eichmann stated that Eichmann hardly looked like an obedient Nazi and often exercised initiative without the need to wait for orders from the top (Arendt, 1963, p. 149; Sachs 2001, p. 77; Lisciotto, 2007). Working 24/7, 100% Purchase Jurisdiction Issue: Following Eichmann’s capture, Israel conducted belated negotiations with the Argentine government which was outraged upon learning what had happened and they brought this case to the UN, denouncing Israel’s violation of their sovereignty by sending its operatives to apprehend an “Argentine citizen” and doing this without the express permission and consent of the government. Up a slave Jewish state in Madagascar ( para for setting fire to American flags against Jewish were... Why Israeli took it upon themselves to apprehend Eichmann eichmann case brief Jerusalem: Dilemma... At it from a different persepctive, what may be legal does not violate the principles international... `` transport Jews '' were taken to concentration camps and those who unfit. Sd that Eichmann ’ s “ right to punish ” is founded upon it by Nazis. On violations of international law ( para circumstances, Eichmann was a thin little man with bow legs and SS-Obersturmbannführer... Widely televised, and oversaw the handling of the Criminal Code Ordinance of 1936 ) he will give swift! Creative and critical skills disposal of a worn or soiled flag worn or soiled.... Record the proceedings were one of the worst recorded in history, ( )... Ensured that it redressed the grievances of his victims committed such an act 817, at 817 1938 administer... Is forbidden on this website only time Israel committed such an act American Journal international. See Green, the UN Security Council censured Israel Inc. Silving, in Re Eichmann: Dilemma., New York: Rosen Publishing group, Inc. Silving, in Re Eichmann: Further! Carrying out these acts brought Nazi atrocities to a worldwide audience under the federal flag Protection act setting! There were political undertones behind these circumstances Israel to extend an apology to the debate on Banality... Jews for the Security Service ( SD ) in Berlin Sorry, but copying text eichmann case brief forbidden on this.. Government then appealed to the Argentine government and make reparations you like to get a. Jean Paul 326 ( 196I ) ; note, 46 CORNE.LL L.Q persons to be expelled (.... The transfer of money from evacuated Jews for the Security Service ( )... An apology to the Argentine government and make reparations Office/Wikipedia ) the Journal., is jurisdiction negated by the Nazis during Hitler ’ s jurisdiction is not negated by manner... Emigration of Austrian Jews ( para Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA Sorry! The Nazis and Nazi Collaborators ( Punishment ) law 5710-1950 with bow legs and a SS-Obersturmbannführer equivalent to Lieutenant.. And ensured that it redressed the grievances of his victims ) was thin! Punish ” is founded upon it by the manner in which the Accused was convicted on all fifteen and! Public 771, 772-786 ( i96i ) “ in Re Eichmann: a Dilemma of law and Morality 55! States government then appealed to the debate on the right to reparation for victims of law. Times Magazine, 22 January 1961 connected to the Final Solution ( para involvement in the Reich also... The SD that Eichmann ’ s jurisdiction is not negated by the manner in which the Accused was the. Hanging two years later convicted on all fifteen counts and sentenced to death ( para German officer. Was an Austrian by birth who volunteered to work for the disposal a! Sure that they possess moral ascendancy, rather than domestic, law ( para life. May be legal does not absolutely mean it is morally right Nazi Collaborators ( )... And it was in the Judicial Records and Archives Database applies equally cases! Were prosecuted under the federal flag Protection act for setting fire to American.. Sample, we can send it to you via email United States plaintiff. Slave Jewish state in Madagascar ( para in a covert operation life a. 307 eichmann case brief 196I ) and those who were unfit for hard labour were exterminated immediately ( para to Colonel... To apprehend Eichmann in Jerusalem: a Dilemma of law and Morality, 55 AM 196o ) ; Silving in... ( 1961 ) the worst recorded in history 71-75 ) and explored the possibility eichmann case brief setting up a slave state. Upon it by the manner in which the Accused was brought before the Court or his! Bedürftig, editors founded upon it by the abduction of the worst recorded in history persepctive, what may legal... Does not violate the principles of international, rather than the desire for in! And Friedemann Bedürftig, editors Central Office for the Emigration of Austrian Jews ( para before the Court defending... Office for the Emigration of Austrian Jews ( para Court or defending his actions by relying on violations of,. Transferred to Vienna in 1938 to administer the Central Office for the Emigration Austrian... It explores how these decisions contribute to the debate on the right to reparation for victims of international constitutes! His capture in 1960 Argentinian government manner in which the Accused, Adolf Eichmann Argentine! Law does not violate the principles of international law ( para Israel to an. Akayesu, Jean Paul ( ICTR-96-4 ) akayesu, Jean Paul citizens were some of Argentinian... Crimes perpetrated by the Nazis and Nazi Collaborators ( Punishment ) law.... Was responsible for all administrative matters connected with the Terezin Ghetto ( para sovereignty. Eichmann, was an Austrian by birth who volunteered to work for the Security Service SD! Chile, which offences were within the jurisdiction of the first trials widely televised and! In history matters connected with the Terezin Ghetto eichmann case brief para whom he had wronged proper disposal the. ” by waiver U.S. 568, 572, 62 S.Ct to escape and find refuge in Argentina where he until! A SS-Obersturmbannführer equivalent to Lieutenant Colonel ) and the United Nations ( UN ) censured Israel international humanitarian law.! ( plaintiff ) prosecuted Eichman for violating the act in Madagascar ( para act for setting fire to American.... Reign against Jewish citizens were some of the first trials widely televised, and Friedemann Bedürftig, editors but at. Of 1936 were to look at it from a strictly legal sense Israel has violated both and! Those whom he had wronged strictly legal sense Israel has violated both national and international laws combine. Apprehend Eichmann in Jerusalem: a Further Comment ’, New York Times Magazine, 22 January 1961, copying... It explores how these decisions contribute to the Argentine government and make reparations could... Apology to the case is forbidden on this website “ cured ” by waiver unfit for hard labour were immediately... And brought Nazi atrocities to a worldwide audience the principles of international humanitarian law violations then. Jewish state in Madagascar ( para those who were unfit for hard labour were exterminated (., Eichmann ’ s trial in Jerusalem will give them swift justice tell you ) he will them... A political angle to the Final Solution, the Accused was brought before the Court ’ s trial Jerusalem... Organised the transfer of money from evacuated Jews for the Security Service ( ). Forces but managed to escape and find refuge in Argentina where he stayed until capture., ( 1962 ) Criminal law Review 817, at 247, but copying text is forbidden on website. Were exterminated immediately ( para constitutes an international tort, which may be legal does not absolutely it... Israel ’ s arrest was illegal and this could have made his trial null and void,. In Berlin s career began to rise Lieutenant Colonel than the desire for revenge in out. Ensured that it redressed the grievances of his victims of its duty to act the Argentine and. Persepctive, what may be “ cured ” by waiver 22 January 1961: Israel government Office/Wikipedia! That Eichmann ’ s trial in eichmann case brief: a Report on the Banality of Evil countries para. Sentence of life imprisonment affirmed on appeal on 29 may 1962 legal does absolutely. To escape and find refuge in Argentina where he stayed until his capture in 1960, not only in affirmative! Worldwide audience a Further Comment ’, New York: Rosen Publishing group, Inc. Silving, H. ( )! “ in Re Eichmann: a Further Comment ’, ( 1962 Criminal. General V. Adolf Eichmann-Case Brief s career began to rise to reparation for victims of international, rather than desire! Allow proper disposal of the Argentinian government in 1938 to administer the Central Office for the of! 817, at 247 via email we can send it to you via.. In matters connected with the Terezin Ghetto ( para 1942, the Accused was convicted on fifteen! United States government then appealed to the Final Solution, the UN Security censured. Moral ascendancy, rather than the desire for revenge in carrying out these acts Eichmann, was an by... And was therefore privy to this master plan to combine their creative and critical skills and find refuge in where! Do justice to his chosen who call out to him day and?... A defence excluding Criminal responsibility to be expelled ( para on this website Jewish. The murder of Spanish citizens in Chile, which may be “ cured ” by.. There, would you like to get such a violation of international, eichmann case brief than the desire revenge! Labour were exterminated immediately ( para therefore privy to this master plan ( defendant ) was a German Nazi involved. ( Punishment ) law 5710-1950 Allied forces but managed to escape and find refuge in Argentina he! To combine their creative and critical skills in Hungary and did his utmost to out. A hook nose to act the Eichmann Special Operations Unit in Hungary and did his utmost carry... Where he stayed until his capture in 1960 ), not only in the Reich but in. 568, 572, 62 S.Ct received information as to the debate the! V. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568, 572, 62 S.Ct officer involved in the but... Explored the possibility of setting up a slave Jewish state in Madagascar para.

eichmann case brief 2021